Brexit in numbers Parliament discusses hit 500 hour mark
Brexit in numbers Parliament discusses hit 500 hour mark England's parliament has spent over 500 hours discussing how to leave the European Union - absent much advancement in about three years.
The nation has been surviving a nightmarish rendition of "Groundhog Day" - the reiteration of similar issues and scenes - as far back as its voters chose to stop the EU in June 2016.
The British parliament has since discussed everything from post-Brexit plant wellbeing guidelines to angling and authority "banner flying days".
Also, Prime Minister Theresa May has actually lost her voice endeavoring to persuade MPs to approve her separation manage Brussels.
However the first 29 March takeoff due date has traveled every which way, and now another one is approaching in 10 days' time.
Specialists who do the math professionally trust that one-6th of the considerable number of hours spent talking in the House of Commons has been committed to Brexit.
Foundation for Government information expert Gavin Freeguard said government employees allude to the split as "the best test of peacetime".
"All the huge things that (May's Conservative gathering) guaranteed in their race proclamation have been dropped as a result of it," Freeguard said.
Here is a look behind the numbers in Britain's enormous Brexit fight - a battle that may yet delay for some more months.
Straightforward math
3 - The number of times the House of Commons has rejected the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement the opposite sides came to following 17 months of talks.
12 - The number of "Plan B" options in contrast to May's way advance that parliament has casted a ballot on in the previous two weeks.
0 - The number of "Plan B" options parliament has affirmed.
2 - The all out number of Brexit-related activities supported by MPs this year. One approached the legislature to renegotiate its arrangement with the EU, which passed on 29 January. The other was a non-restricting movement precluding Britain from leaving without an understanding that won on 14 March.
1 - The number of times May's Conservative Party attempted to expel her over her treatment of Brexit. She endure the 12 December overthrow endeavor vote 200-117.
1 - The number of times the resistance Labor Party attempted to expel May's legislature over its treatment of Brexit. May endure the 16 January no-certainty vote 325-306.
3 - The number of times different parliamentary gatherings attempted - and fizzled - to get Brexit put to another open vote.
Complex numbers
The greater numbers were ordered by Institute for Government investigators utilizing parliamentary sessional journals and different records.
501 - The number of hours the House of Commons spent examining Brexit from the minute Britain casted a ballot to leave the EU in June 2016 to the day it should have left a week ago.
33 - The hours May has spent making explanations on the EU withdrawal. In any case, she additionally takes part in week by week question time sessions in parliament that regularly last a few hours and are devoured by warmed Brexit talk.
200 - The number of hours different authoritative advisory groups have spent talking about Brexit issues from the principle Commons chamber.
161 - The number of hours peers in the House of Lords - Britain's upper council of parliament - spent examining the EU Withdrawal Act.
Intangibles
So what are the issues driving so much discussion?
The House of Commons Library outline of the Brexit points discussed for the current year alone is 26 pages in length.
It begins with one about "Tobacco Products and Public Health" on January 7 and closures with "Banners (Northern Ireland) (Amendment)" on March 25.
The two assemblies of parliament have addressed everything from criminal equity to prepare licenses and open part cooking.
A going with perusing rundown of the considerable number of distributions discharged by parliament rushes to 66 pages.
It includes an area on man-made brainpower and closures with a March 29 preparation paper entitled: "Brexit implies Brexit... be that as it may, not exactly yet

No comments